Add VideoWall feature: server-side preview clip generation and mobile grid view

Backend (Rust/Actix-web):
- Add video_preview_clips table and PreviewDao for tracking preview generation
- Add ffmpeg preview clip generator: 10 equally-spaced 1s segments at 480p with CUDA NVENC auto-detection
- Add PreviewClipGenerator actor with semaphore-limited concurrent processing
- Add GET /video/preview and POST /video/preview/status endpoints
- Extend file watcher to detect and queue previews for new videos
- Use relative paths consistently for DB storage (matching EXIF convention)

Frontend (React Native/Expo):
- Add VideoWall grid view with 2-3 column layout of looping preview clips
- Add VideoWallItem component with ActiveVideoPlayer sub-component for lifecycle management
- Add useVideoWall hook for batch status polling with 5s refresh
- Add navigation button in grid header (visible when videos exist)
- Use TextureView surface type to fix Android z-ordering issues
- Optimize memory: players only mount while visible via FlatList windowSize
- Configure ExoPlayer buffer options and caching for short clips
- Tap to toggle audio focus, long press to open in full viewer

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Cameron
2026-02-25 19:40:17 -05:00
parent 7a0da1ab4a
commit 19c099360e
19 changed files with 1691 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Specification Quality Checklist: VideoWall
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-02-25
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
## Content Quality
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
## Requirement Completeness
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
## Feature Readiness
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
## Notes
- All items pass validation.
- Assumptions section documents reasonable defaults for format choice, column layout interpretation, and infrastructure reuse.
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers were needed — the user description was specific enough to make informed decisions for all requirements.