Files
ImageApi/specs/001-video-wall/checklists/requirements.md
Cameron 19c099360e Add VideoWall feature: server-side preview clip generation and mobile grid view
Backend (Rust/Actix-web):
- Add video_preview_clips table and PreviewDao for tracking preview generation
- Add ffmpeg preview clip generator: 10 equally-spaced 1s segments at 480p with CUDA NVENC auto-detection
- Add PreviewClipGenerator actor with semaphore-limited concurrent processing
- Add GET /video/preview and POST /video/preview/status endpoints
- Extend file watcher to detect and queue previews for new videos
- Use relative paths consistently for DB storage (matching EXIF convention)

Frontend (React Native/Expo):
- Add VideoWall grid view with 2-3 column layout of looping preview clips
- Add VideoWallItem component with ActiveVideoPlayer sub-component for lifecycle management
- Add useVideoWall hook for batch status polling with 5s refresh
- Add navigation button in grid header (visible when videos exist)
- Use TextureView surface type to fix Android z-ordering issues
- Optimize memory: players only mount while visible via FlatList windowSize
- Configure ExoPlayer buffer options and caching for short clips
- Tap to toggle audio focus, long press to open in full viewer

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-25 19:40:17 -05:00

1.3 KiB

Specification Quality Checklist: VideoWall

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-02-25 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • All items pass validation.
  • Assumptions section documents reasonable defaults for format choice, column layout interpretation, and infrastructure reuse.
  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers were needed — the user description was specific enough to make informed decisions for all requirements.